Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

WILLIAM G. REAMON, CHAIRPERSON PATRICK J. KEATING. VICE-CHAIRPERSON BERNADINE N. DENNING. SECRETARY JOHN L . COTE MARTIN M. DOCTOROFF ROBERT S. HARRISON CHARLES C . VINCENT. M. D.

STATE OF MICHIGAN olj @i$tipIinp

JOHN F. X. DWAIHY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR S GENERAL COUNSEL

SUITE 1260 3 3 3 W. FORT STREET DETROIT. MICHIGAN 4 8 2 2 6 TELEPHONE:(313) 9 6 3 - 5 5 5 3

imTIcE OF SUSPENSION F i l e No. DP 90/84

ALFRED G. KAUFHAN, J B . , P 27926, P.O. Box 156, Lusk, Wyoming 82225, by Order of the Wayne County Hearing Pane l #22 of the Attorney D i s c i p l i n e Board.

1. Suspension 2. For a pe r iod of n ine ty (90) days. 3. E f f e c t i v e 23 J u l y 1985. Respondent admi t ted t h a t the Supreme Court o f Wyoming i n March 1984 p u b l i c l y reprimanded and censured him, and suspended h i s l i c e n s e t o p r a c t i c e law i n t h a t s t a t e f o r one year . H e was found i n Wyoming to have h a b i t u a l l y v i o l a t e d t h e Federa l Rules of C i v i l Procedure and U.S. District Court d i scovery o r d e r s ; of misrepresents t i o n s t o c l i e n t s ; of n e g l e c t i n g a c a s e , and a t t empt ing l e g a l s e r v i c e s w i thou t adequate p repa ra t i on ; and o f f r a d u l e n t l y r e c e i v i n g funds from a n estate wi thou t c o u r t approval .

The panel found that Respondent had v i o l a t e d former GCR 196 3 , 953 [now MCR 9.1041 , and Canons 1, 6 , and 7 of t he Code of P r o f e s s i o n a l Respons ib i l i t y : DR 1 - 1 0 2 ( ~ )( 1)( 2 ) (4 ) - (6 ) ; DR 6-lOl(A) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ; DR 7 - 1 0 1 ( ~ )( 3) and DR 7-106(C) ( 7 ) . I n a s s e s s i n g d i s c i p l i n e , t h e pane l noted that the re w i l l be no c l i e n t n o t i f i c a t i o n requirements i n Michigan s i n c e Respondent does n o t main ta in a n o f f i c e here . P r i o r d i s c i p l i n e of a reprimand i n 1982 was considered. Costs o f $240.92 were imposed.

fZM& ha Franc i s Helminski I n t e r i m Counsel

Dated:

26 J u l y 1985

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.