Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

BOARD MEMBERS WILLIAM G. REAMON, CHAIRPERSON LYNN H . SHECTER, VICE -CHAIRPERSON BERNADINE N. DENNING. SECRETARY JOHN L . COTE LEO A. FARHAT PATRICK J. KEATING CHARLES C . VINCENT. M. 0.

STATE OF MICHIGAN

J O H N F. X . DWAIHY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & GENERAL COUNSEL

SUITE 1260 333 W. FORT STREET DETROIT, MICHIGAN 4 8 2 2 6 TELEPHONE: (313)9 63-5553

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION F i l e No: DP-109184

ROBERT POWELL, (P22870), Pos t Off i c e Box 817, Battle Creek, Michigan 49016, D i s c i p l i n e Board.

by

Kalamazoo Hearing

Panel 112

of

the Attorney

(1) Suspension (2 ) For a per iod of 2 yea r s ( 3 ) E f f e c t i v e December 20, 1984 The Hearing Panel found: t h a t Respondent neglec ted a c e r t a i n domes t i c r e l a t i o n s ma t t e r , f a i l i n g t o i n s t i t u t e l e g a l proceedings t o s e c u r e p h y s i c a l custody of h i s c l i e n t ' s granddaughter; t h a t Respondent, during h i s i n i t i a l in te rv iew wi th the c l i e n t furn ished he r w i t h a bus iness card which i d e n t i f i e d Respondent a s a member of the Nat iona l

Community Media t i o n Off i c e s , which o rgan iza t ion was no t i n e x i s t ance; t h a t Respondent's use of s a i d bus iness ca rd ind ica t ed a n a t t e m p t t o dece ive prospec t ive c l i e n t s ; t h a t Respondent f a i l e d t o answer t h e Gr ievance Administrator ' s Request f o r I n v e s t i g a t i o n ; t h a t Respondent, appearing i n the o f f i c e s of the Attorney Grievance Commission, provided f a l s e information regarding h i s communia t i ons w i t h h i s c l i e n t . The Panel found v i o l a t i o n s of Canons 1, 6 , 7 and 9 of t h e Code of P ro fe s s iona l Respons ib i l i t y , to-wi t: ~ ~ 1 - 1 0 2((4~-6)), DR~-101( ~ ) ( 1 - 3 ) , D R ~ - 1 0 1 ((~1-)3 ) and ~ ~ 9 - 1 0 2 ( B(4) ) and GCR 1963, 953(1-4) and ( 6 ) .

Dated: January 11, 1985

P\$iC.t!URvi E;:y.~wtiVW~ ECW

PRIOR NOTICE AND COPIES OF HEARING PANEL ORDER 6 REPORT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.