Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

BOARD MEMBERS JOHN L . COTE. CHAIRPERSON LEO A. FARHAT MSGR. CLEMENT H . KERN DAVID BAKER LEWIS. SECRETARY FRANK J . MCDEVITT. D. 0 .

WILLIAM G. REAMON LYNN H . SHECTER. VICE-CHAIRPERSON

STATE OF MICHIGAN

MAiLliiG A5DRESS:

P. 0. BOX 149 DETROIT. MICHIGAN 48231

J O H N F. X . DWAIHY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 6 GENERAL COUNSEL

SUITE 1 2 6 0 3 3 3 W . FORT STREET DETROIT. MICHIGAN 4 8 2 2 6 T E L E P H O N E : ( ~ I ~9]6 3 - 5 5 5 3

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION DP-271/82 PH1LI.P. ' J . TOCCO (P 21484) , 11645 Conant, D e t r o i t , M I , 48212, by Attorney Disc ip l ine Board Wayne County Hearing Panel #23.

(1) Suspension; (2) For a per iod of n ine ty (90) days; (3) Ef fec t ive Date t o be determined a t end of p r i o r suspension. (NOTE: Respondent i s p resen t ly suspended and has no t sought reinstatement i n a p r i o r mat ter . )

The hearing panel found t h a t Respondent f a i l e d t o comply with a p r i o r order of d i s c i p l i n a r y suspension by f a i l i n g t o pay c o s t s ordered i n t h e amount of $284.84; Respondent f a i l e d t o answer t h e Grievance Administrator 's Request f o r Inves t iga t ion i n regard t o s a i d v i o l a t i o n . The hear ing panel r epor ted t h a t Respondent d id no t appear before t h e panel and, on t h e b a s i s of t h e d e f a u l t , found t h a t t h e charges were es t ab l i shed . The panel considered p r i o r misconduct of a reprimand i n 1970, 15 day suspension, 1982, and a 60 day suspension which was e f f e c t i v e September 23, 1982. The panel ordered the add i t ion- a l per iod of suspension t o commence "from t h e da te upon which Respondent complies with the requirements of (a p r i o r ) hearing panel order o f suspension ..." The suspension i n t h e p resen t case (DP-271/82) w i l l no t begin u n t i l t he end of t h e p r i o r suspension which remains i n e f f e c t , Respondent no t having f i l e d t h e r e q u i s i t e a f f i d a v i t f o r auto- matic re ins ta tement .

Dated:

A p r i l 14, 1983

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.