Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

BOARD MEMBERS JOHN L . COTE. CHAIRPERSON LEO A. FARHAT MSGR. CLEMENT H . KERN DAVID BAKER LEWIS. SECRETARY FRANK J . MCDEVITT, D . 0 .

WILLIAM G. REAMON LYNN H . SHECTER. VICE-CHAIRPERSON

STATE OF MICHIGAN

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION

J O H N F. X.DWAIHY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & GENERAL COUNSEL

SUITE 1260 3 3 3 W. FORT STREET DETROIT. MICHIGAN 48226 TELEPHONE:(^^^) 9 6 3 - 5 5 5 3

I

F i l e No. DP-191/80 & DP-164/80 (Two Consol idated Complaints)

LARRY A. GIRARD (P 14022), 24800 Northwestern Hwy., S u i t e 203, S o u t h f i e l d , M I 48075, by t h e Attorney D i s c i p l i n e Board a f f i r m i n g t h e hear- i n g panel d e c i s i o n pursuant t o a delayed p e t i t i o n f o r review.

(1) (2) (3)

Suspension; For a pe r iod of 180 days; E f f e c t i v e June 1 6 t h ( a s p rev ious ly publ ished i n p r i o r n o t i c e of suspens ion pending appea l ) . .. . -

The hea r ing panel found t h a t Respondent had v i o l a t e d t h e Rules of P r o f e s s i o n a l Conduct a s a l l e g e d i n two conso l ida t ed Formal Complaints con- s i s t i n g of a combined t o t a l of twelve counts . The pane l found t h a t Respon- den t f a i l e d t o p rov ide s e r v i c e s agreed upon and neg lec t ed t h e p rosecu t ion of a c i v i l a c t i o n t o en fo rce a judgment a f t e r r e c e i v i n g a r e t a i n e r f e e ; t h a t Respondent was pa id a f e e and agreed t o hand le a d i v o r c e a c t i o n , f i l e d t h e Complaint, b u t f a i l e d t o en fo rce a n i n t e r i m o r d e r f o r suppor t , ad jou rn v a r i o u s hea r ing d a t e s , f a i l e d o r r e fused t o communicate w i t h t h e c l i e n t d e s p i t e numerous c a l l s by t h e c l i e n t , f a i l e d t o appear a t t h e hea r ing on t h e motion f o r e n t r y of d e f a u l t judgment a g a i n s t h i s c l i e n t , f a i l e d t o n o t i f y t h e c l i e n t of s a i d hea r ing and t h e r e s u l t s t h e r e o f , and f a i l e d t o p rov ide a copy of t h e judgment t o h i s c l i e n t , and f a i l e d t o t a k e f u r t h e r s t e p s t o r e p r e s e n t t h e c l i e n t ' s i n t e r e s t s ; t h a t Respondent agreed t o appea l a c e r t a i n c r i m i n a l s en tence and w a s pa id a f e e of $2,100.00, b u t neg lec t ed t o pursue t h e matter and f a i l e d t o account t o t h e p a r t y paying t h e f e e r ega rd ing s e r v i c e s render- ed; t h a t Respondent d iv ided a f e e wi thout consent of t h e c l i e n t and wi thout regsrd t o t h e p ropor t ion of s e r v i c e s performed by t h e payee - re fe r r ing a t t o r - ney; t h a t Respondent f a i l e d t o f i l e o r p repa re a c r i m i n a l a p p e l l a t e b r i e f r e s u l t i n g i n d i s m i s s a l f o r l a c k of p rog res s , f a i l e d t o d i s c l o s e t h e d i s m i s s a l t o t h c c r i m i n a l c l i e n t , m i s rep resen t ing t h e s t a t u s of t h e c a s e t o t h e c l i e n t and t ak ing no f u r t h e r a c t i o n on t h e c l i e n t ' s b e h a l f ; t h a t Respondent neg lec t ed

a p o r t i o n of a pe r sona l i n j u r y c l a im invo lv ing monthly medica l and home c a r e ex- penses a f t e r having s e t t l e d on o t h e r damages f o r t h e c l i e n t and f a i l e d t o meet w i th t h e c l i e n t s a s scheduled. The panel found t h a t Respondent was g u i l t y of misconduct i n connect ion w i t h charges t h a t he f a i l e d t o answer 7 Requests f o r I n v e s t i g a t i o n submit ted by t h e Grievance Adminis t ra tor i n v i c l a t i c n of GCR 353 (7 ) and 962 .2 (b) .

Notice of Suspension In Re Lerzy A. Girard Pas.? 1.0

The pane l found v i o l a t i o n s of Canons 1, 6, and 7 of t h e Code of P r o f e s s i o n a l R e s p o n s i b i l i t y . The panel found no evidence i n m i t i g a t i o n 5ut noted no p r i o r h i s t o r y of d i s c i p l i n e . Costs were a s se s sed i n t h e amount of $470.50. Respcndwt f i l e d a l a t e P e t i t i o n f o r Review, b u t w a s g r an ted a

rev iew h e a r i n g by t h e Board.

L JOHN F. X DWAIHY, m-D '7%Ge neral Counsel

m,,

dal,"i C + L DAVID BAKER LEWIS, Secretaw of the Attorney Discipline Board

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.