Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

BOARD MEMBERS JOHN L. COTE. CHAIRPERSON LEO A. FARHAT MSGR. CLEMENT H . KERN DAVID BAKER LEWIS. SECRETARY FRANK J. MCDEVITT. D. 0 .

WILLIAM G. REAMON LYNN H . SHECTER.

VICE-CHAIRPERSON

STATE O F MICHIGAN

NOTICE OF REVOCATION

JOHN F. X . DWAIHY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 6 GENERAL COUNSEL

SUITE 1260 3 3 3 W.FORT STREET

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 4 8 2 2 6 TELEPHONE :(313) 9 6 3 - 5 5 5 3

WATSON A. ZDRODOWSKI (P 22699), 6825 Al len Rd., Al len Park, M I 48101, by Attorney D i s c i p l i n e Board Wayne C i r c u i t Hearing Pane l "Q".

(1) Revocation of l i c e n s e ; (2) E f f e c t i v e A p r i l 28, 1982. The Formal Complaint charged: t h a t Respondent as executor and f i d u c i a r y of a n e s t a t e du r ing a per iod of approximately f o u r (4) y e a r s

)

f a i l e d , neg lec t ed and/or r e fused t o : account t o t h e probate c o u r t f o r r e c e i p t of t h e a s s e t s ; i d e n t i f y and l a b e l t h e a s s e t s ; main ta in complete r eco rd of a l l a s s e t s coming i n t o h i s possess ion; pay and/or d e l i v e r t o t h e h e i r s t h e assets of t h e e s t a t e ; pay over t h e r e s idua ry a s s e t s i n t h e amount of $150,000 as ordered by t h e Court r e s u l t i n g i n t h e f i n a n c i a l l o s s t o t h e e s t a t e i n t h e form of i n t e r e s t and p e n a l t i e s on unpaid t axes , t h e c o s t s of f e e s f o r s e r v i c e s of a succes so r f i d u c i a r y and t h e c o s t o f f e e s f o r t h e r e t a i n e r of an accountant t o a u d i t Respondent's accountings. Respondent admi t ted t h e s e charges a s w e l l a s t h e commingling and conver- s i o n of s a i d funds wi th h i s own a s s e t s f o r h i s own use. The Complaint f u r t h e r charged t h a t Respondent knowingly made a f a l s e s ta tement t o t h e Wayne County Probate Judge r ega rd ing t h e reason f o r h i s f a i l u r e t o make f i n a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e a s s e t s a s ordered . A s e p a r a t e count f u r t h e r charged t h a t Respondent p e t i t i o n e d f o r and was allowed f e e s f o r s e r v i c e s i n t h e amount of $80,000 r e l a t i v e t o s a i d e s t a t e , and t h a t s a i d f e e s were exces s ive and c o n s t i t u t e d over reaching by Respondent. The Com- p l a i n t charged v i o l a t i o n s of Canons 1, 2, 7 and 9 of t h e Code of Profes-

s i o n a l Respons ib i l i t y , to-wit: DR1-102(A)(3)(6), DR2-106(A), DR7-101 (A)(2) (3) , DR9-109(B) (1) - (4) , and GCR 953 (1-4). The hea r ing pane l r e p o r t e d t h a t Respondent admit ted t o t h e a l l e g a t i o n s i n a l l f o u r counts of t h e Formal Complaint i n v i o l a t i o n of a l l r u l e s a l l e g e d . Cos ts were a s s e s s e d i n t h e amount of $115.72.

,

, I CBdN F. X DWAIHY, & General Counsel

APR 2 9 1382

" s 4 - ---- DAVID BAKER LEWIS, Sgsretaiy qf the Attorney Discipline Board

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.