Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

W A R D Y C Y M R S JOHN L COTC. CnAlRPLRSON LCO A. FARMAT Y I O ~CL CUEUT n MEAN OW10 W C R LEWIS. SCCRCTART fRANR J YCOCVITT. 0 . 0 . WILL- 0 . R U Y O N LYNN W . S H L C T C I . - VICE c~AIRPCRSON

STATE OF MICHIGAN

J O n N f. r .DwArnr EXECUTIVE OlACCTOA A GCNCRAL COUNSCL

SUITE 1 2 6 0 3 3 3 W.fORT S T R C L I DETROIT. YICMIGAN 482ZI r r L c P n o m c :(313) 063 - sss

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION F i l e N o s . DP-109/81 L DP-65/81

ARMAND BOVE (P 11050) , 22815 K e l l y Rd., E a s t D e t r o i t , MI 40021, by A t t o r n e y D i s c i p l i n e Board Wayne C i r c u i t Hear- i n g P a n e l 'Om. , (1) Suspens ion ; (2) For a p e r i o d o f t h i r t y (30) days; 3 E f f e c t i v e (by s p e c i a l o r d e r ) J u n e 1, 1982. The h e a r i n g p a n e l found t h a t Respondent n e g l e c t e d set- t l e m e n t o f a c e r t a i n p e r s o n a l i n j u r y claim, e n t e r e d i n t o a e o n t i n g e n t f e e agreement n o t i n conformi ty w i t h GCR 1963, 928, f a i l e d to n o t i f y t h e c l i e n t r e g a r d i n g t h e s t a t u s o f h e r case or o t h e r w i s e communicate w i t h h e r , f a i l e d to f i l e a c i v i l compla in t r e s u l t i n g i n l o s s o f t h e claim under t h e n t a t u t e o f l i m i t a t i o n s . Regarding a s e p a r a t e coun t , t h e p a n e l found t h a t Respondent f a i l e d t o respond to a n o t i c e i s s u e d by t h e p r o b a t e c o u r t r e g a r d i n g removal o f t h e f i d u - c i a r y f o r f a i l u r e to f i l e a c c o u n t s and f a i l e d to respond t o r e q u e s t s o f s u b s t i t u t e c o u n s e l f o r in fo rmat ion . Respon- d e n t was charged w i t h s i x c o u n t s o f f a i l u r e to answer re- quaotr ­f ar i n v e s t i g a t i o n submi t t ed by t h e Grievance Adminis- t r a t o r t h e p a n e l found Respondent a d m i t t e d s a i d f a i l u r e s and alno a d m ~ t t e dt o h i s f a i l u r e t o answer a Formal Complaint , which I r meparate misconduct. The p a n e l found v i o l a t i o n s o f Crnono 1, 6 , and 7 of t h e Code o f P r o f e s s i o n a l R e s p o n s i b i l i t y , t o - w i t ; : DRl-102 (A) ( 5 - 6 ) , DR6-101 (A) ( 3 ) and DR7-101 (A) (1-3) , C C W 1Ybd, 928 , 9 5 3 ( 1 - 4 ) (7) . C o s t s were a s s e s s e d i n t h e ursutrt of $ 4 1 0 . 1 5 , The pane l a d j u s t e d t h e o r i g i n a l o r d e r sL draciplitrcl, allowing a d e l a y i n t h e e f f e c t i v e d a t e .

(+Lsy& -4 --" e - c)~)Q-~HI x -~Iw~#+t MYC, -U~W 4 @g&*st ~cIIJIIMJ

./. l q ,:A7 & OAV13 G.KER LE1.":S. Secretary d the A t l r r t u y L 1 ~ c t . 1 1 1 . 1 - f3c :rd

\

APW

l lug3

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.