Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

BOARD M E M B E R S FREDERICK G B u E S S E R JR JOHN L COTE. CHAIRPERSON MSGR CLEMENT H K E R N DAVID BAKER L E W I S . SCCRET*Ry FRANK J. MCDEVITT, 0 0 WILLIPM G R E A M O N L Y N N U. SHECTER. VICE-CHAIRPERSON

STATE O F MICHIGAN ,p @islciplinp

r

.

JOHN F . x DwAIHY EXECUT~VE D ~ R E C T O R ~ GENERAL COUNSEL

SUITE 1260 333 W. FORT STREET DETROIT. MICHIGAN 1 8 2 2 6 TELEPHONE: (313) 963 - 5 5 5 3

This is to inform the Courts of the State of Michigan of the following Order of Discipline: NOTICE OF SUSPENSION File No. 3 5 4 4 7 - A LeROY W. DAGGS, (P124351, 2150 Edison Plaza, Detroit, Michigan, 48226, by Order of the Michigan Supreme Court affirming the decision of the Attorney Discipline Board. ( 1) Suspension; ( 2 ) For a period of one (1) year; (3) Effective August 10, 1981. Q) The Attorney Discipline Board, affirmed the findings of fact of t h e Hearing Panel, but modified the period of suspension. The Board ngrc.sd with the Panel that Petitioner had neglected a criminal appeal n u t t cr resulting in dismissal for lack of progress, t h a t fJet i t lnr~er mi srcpresented that the appeal had been denied rather t t r t~nd ismissed; regarding a separate Count the Board agreed wi th t h e f ' i 1 t 1 c . 1 r t tu t I'et i tisner had delayed for several years a p r o b a t e estate. In a separate Count the Board affirmed the finding!. thitt. 1'c.t i t ic~l-rrrn c g l c*crcd another criminal appeal to which he was a p p o l r ~ ~ c di t \ Hc*cotdrr's Court, that Petitioner sought to obtain ;i removal f r o m rhc cn6,cb but did so improperly, the Petitioner failed to file a timely c l a i m of A p p e a l . The Board affirmed the Panel findings tjf v i r t i a ~ i o n t . < ,f C'anons 1 , b and 7 of the Code of Professional Kcc.potlai bi I i t y , t o - w l t 1)Ut-102, ( A ) , (41, (51, and ( 6 1 , DR 6-101, ( A ) , ( 2 1 nrrtl ( 3 ) ntict 1jR I - ) f ) l , {A), 1 1 1 , (21 and (3). TheMichigan Supr ernr ( r l t l t r at \ [ rtl I r -nvr ~ C PI ~ P ~ I C Ja~nId~ i ssued an opinion affirming

t h e 1 ) i s c I p l ! trc hoaril t ic< f hiiori. H c c t ~ ~ ~oafe the interim Stay of I l i st i pi l t-ri. ~ > c * r t it lr ~p, g p ( i ~ aLf. t i , t tie Board rind the Supreme Court there

w w h o t i e l a y

I r i I t r e 6 * f f e t t f V r r i a f r t t f the i.ilspension.

/

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.