Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

BOARD MEMBERS FREDERICK G. BUESSER. JR. JOHN L. COT^, CHAIRPERSON

MSGR. CLEMENT H. KERN DAVID BAKER LEWIS, SECRETARY

FRANK J. MCDEVITT, D.O. WILLIAM G. REAMON LYNN H. SHECTER. VICE-CHAIRPERSON

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOHN F. X . DWAIHY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 8'

GENERAL COUNSEL

SUITE 1260 3 3 3 W . FORT STREET DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226 TELEPHONE: (313) 9 6 3 - 5 5 '

This i s t o inform t h e Courts of t h e S t a t e of Michigan of t h e following Order of Disc ip l ine :

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION DP-139/80 and DP-159/80 FRANCIS A. BROWNING, (P11314), 4030 Newland Drive, W . , Orchard Lake, Michigan 48033, by Attorney ~ i s c i p l i n eB oard Order Affirming Hearing Panel ~ e c i s i o n . (1) Suspension; (2 ) For a pe r iod of 60 days; a 1 , (3) E f f e c t i v e J u l y 2 7 , 1981.

The Hearing Panel considered two consol idated Formal Complaints involving a t o t a l of e i g h t Counts. The Panel d i s - missed two Counts, but found t h a t Respondent had admitted f a i l - ure t o answer t h e Grievance Adminis t ra tor ' s Request f o r Inves- t i g a t i o n i n t h r e e separa te ma t t e r s , which c o n s t i t u t e s misconduct d i s t i n c t from the subs tan t ive a l l e g a t i o n s . The Panel a l s o found t h a t Respondent neglected a divorce ma t t e r , f a i l e d t o keep t h e c l i e n t advised of t h e s t a t u s of t h e case and f a i l e d t o take any a c t i o n inc luding a c t i o n t o prevent d i smissa l o r cause r e i n s t a t e - ment a f t e r d ismissa l . Respondent was found t o have neglected a sepa ra te personal i n j u r y mat ter and f a i l e d t o t ake any a c t i o n t o r e i n s t a t e t h e case upon d i smissa l f o r f a i l u r e of Respondent t o appear a t a p r e - t r i a l hear ing, and f a i l e d t o n o t i f y h i s

c l i e n t s of s a i d d i smissa l . The Respondent sought review by t h e Attorney Disc ip l ine Board.

Respondent was assessed c o s t s

i n t h e amount of $561.94 and was requi red by t h e Hearing Panel t o make r e s t i t u t i o n i n t h e amount of $100 t o one c l i e n t p r i o r t o reinstatement .

& Y0 a e , ~ 4 DAVID BAKER LEWIS, Secre tary ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

0 '9 \ I

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.