Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS REV. MICHAEL MURRAY CHAIRPERSON JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR.

LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD ANNA FRUSHOUR

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226·3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRA TOR

ALLY SON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONISTISECRETARY

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND WITH CONDITIONS (By Consent)

Case No. 18-55-JC

Notice Issued: November 9, 2018

John J. Holler, III, P 43344, Wyandotte, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri· County Hearing Panel #15.

Reprimand, Effective November 9, 2018

The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Reprimand with Conditions, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admission that he was convicted in a matter titled People of the State of Michigan v John Joseph Holler, 11/, 27th District Court Case No. 17-4096, of the misdemeanor of operating while intoxicated, in violation of MCl 257.6256B. Based on respondent's conviction and admissions in the stipulation, the hearing panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct by engaging in conduct that violated the criminal law of a state or of the United States, an ordinance, or tribal law pursuant to MCR 2.615, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded and that he be subject to conditions relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $764.82. QoJb

Mark A. Armitage

'

.

, ---.:.

Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.