Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

I

BOARD M E M B E R S

MSGR. CLEMENT H. KERN DAVID BAKER LEWIS, SECRETARY FRANK J. MCDEVITT. D . 0 . WILLIAM G. REAMON LYNN H . SHECTER. V ICE-CHAIRPERSON

STATE OF MICHIGAN

..wun.uLL,--#-,,#.,.

SUITE 1 2 6 0 3 3 3 W. FORT STREET DETROIT. MICHIGAN 4 8 2 2 6

TELEPHONE: (313) 9 6 3 - 5 5 5 3

T h i s i s t o inform the Courts of the S t a t e of Michigan of the Following Order of Discipline: NOTICE OF DISBARMENT Fi le No. DP-80/80 Re1 ated: 37675 GEORGE S. SILASKI (P20450), 133 W. Cedar, Kal amazoo, MI 49006, by Attorney Di sc i pl i ne Board Kal amazoo C i rcui t Heari ng Panel liB". (1 ) Permanent revocation of 1i cense; (2 ) Effective September 10, 1980.

The Formal Complaint charged t h a t Respondent was retained t o discharge a ce r t a in land contract debt and was paid a r e t a ine r f ee and took possession of $3,200.87 w i t h ins t ruc t ions t o place sa id sum i n his Trust Account f o r delivery t o the land con t rac t vendor o r h i s a t torney. Resp0ndent . i~c harged w i t h f a i l i n g and refusing t o de l iver the sum entrus ted by the c l i e n t and w i t h f a i l u r e and refusal t o render an accounting of sa id funds and w i t h conversion of sa id money t o Respondent's own use, sa id misconduct being i n v io la t ion of GCR 953 (3-4) , Canon 1 , DR 1-102 (A) ( 4 ) , Canon 6 , DE 6-101 (A) (3 ) and Canon 9, DR 9-102 (B) (1 ) (3 ) (4 ) of the Code of Professional Responsibil i ty. The Complaint of the Grievance Administrator f u r the r charges t h a t Respondent f a i l e d t o answer the Request f o r Invest igat ion of sa id grievance i n v io la t ion of Canon 1 , DR 1-102 (A) (5 ) ( 6 ) and GCR 953 ( 1 4 ) (7 ) . The Hearing Panel determined t h a t the a l l ega t ions of the Grievance Administrator had been proven and assessed cos t s i n the amount of $124.40. No appeal t o the Attorney Discipl ine Board was f i l e d .

September 15, 1980.

David Baker Lewis, Secretary ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.