Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

BOARD MEMBERS FREDERICK G; BUESSER. JR. JOHN L. COTE, CHAIRPERSON MSGR. CLEMENT H. KERN

DAVID BAKER LEWIS. SECRETARY FRANK J. MCDEVITT, 0.0 . WILLIAM G. REAMON LYNN H. SHECTER. VICE-CHAIRPERSON

STATE O F M I C H I G A N

JOHN F. X . DWAIHY COUNSEL/ADMINISTRATOR

SUITE 1 2 6 0 333 W. FORT STREET DETROIT, MICHIGAN 4 8 2 2 6

TELEPHONE: (313) 9 6 3 - 5 5 5 3

T h i s i s to inform the Courts of the State of Michigan of the following f inal Order of Discipline: NOTICE OF SUSPENSION File No. 36761-A DP-27/80 JOHN R . LAKE (P16353), 2 Chief Okemos Circle, Okemos, MI 48864, by Attorney Di scipl ine Board Oakland Circuit Hearing Panel -A (1 ) Suspension; ( 2 ) For a period of 121 days, or until fur ther order of the Supreme Court; ( 3 ) Effective June 9, 1980.

Respondent was charged in a three-count Formal Complaint with: Receiving substantial fees and agreeing t o commence certain probate proceedings; neglect, f a i lu re and/or refusal t o perform services necessary t o close the probate e s t a t e and effectuate discharge of the fiduciary; f a i lu re , neglect and/or refusal t o communicate to the cl i en t the s tatus of said probate es ta te ; neglect resulting in surcharges f o r in teres t and penal t i e s ; f a i 1u re, neglect and/or refusal t o d is t r ibute to the probate c l i e n t $100 in funds held in escrow; and, f a i l u r e to answer the Request f o r Investigation of the Grievance Administrator i n regard t o said misconduct. The Complaint charged Respondent w i t h vi 01 ating Canon 6, DR6-101 ( A ) (3) and Canon 7, DR7-101 ( A ) (1- 3) , Canon 1, DR1-102(A)(1)(5-6), Canon 9, DR9-102(B)(3-4) and GCR 1963, 953 (1-4) and (7 ) . The Hearing Panel concluded tha t Respondent violated Canon 1 , Canon 6 and Canon 9 of the Code of Professional Responsibility as charged i n the Formal Complaint. No Petit ion for Review was f i l e d .

June 27, 1980

David Baker Lewis, Secretary ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.