Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS THOMAS G. KIENBAUM

CHAIRPERSON JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. VICE-CHAIRPERSON SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D.

SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL DULCE M. FULLER LOUANN VAN DERWIELE

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROI1.. MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHvNE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571 WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF DISBARMENT (Pending Appeal) Case No. 11-24-GA Notice Issued: June 18, 2013

Daniel L. Mercier, P 72620, Troy, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #67.

1. Disbarment 2. Effective April 15, 2013 Based upon respondent's admissions in his answer to the first amended complaint and his answers placed on the record, the hearing panel found that respondent had failed, as an applicant for admission to the bar, to inform the standing committee on character and fitness, in writing, that

his answers in his affidavit of personal history had changed and/or ceased to be true, in violation of MRPC 8.1 (b)(2); violated or attempted to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, contrary to MRPC 8.4(a); and engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or violation of the criminal law, where such conduct reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty,

trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of MRPC 8.4(b).

The panel ordered that respondent be disbarred from the practice law in Michigan, effective February 13, 2013. Respondent filed a petition for review, along with a request for a temporary stay of discipline. On February 11, 2013, the Attorney Discipline Board granted respondent's

request for a temporary stay of discipline and ordered that respondent's disbarment would go into effect on April 15, 2013. On March 28, 2013, respondent filed a motion for final stay of discipline, which was denied by the Attorney Discipline Board on April 4, 2013, and respondent's disbarment from the practice of law in Michigan became effective on April 15, 2013.

Board.

This matter has been scheduled for review proceedings before the Attorney Discipline

Dated: _______

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.