Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD CHAIRPERSON ALAN GERSHEL VICE-CHAIRPERSON REV. DR. LOUIS J. PRUES SECRETARY PETER A. SMIT LINDA M. ORLANS

JASON M. TURKISH ANDREAS SIDIROPOULOS, MD KATIE STANLEY TISH VINCENT

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

333 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1700

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL SHERRY MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST/SECRETARY

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3147

PHONE: 313-963-5553

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND (By Consent)

Case Nos. 22-65-JC; 22-66-GA 1 Notice Issued: December 6, 2022 David M. Parrott, P38424, Van Buren Township, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #10

Reprimand, Effective December 3, 2022 Respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Reprimand, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent’s admission that he was convicted by no contest plea of operating while impaired, a misdemeanor, in violation of MCL 257.6253-A, in People of the State of Michigan v David Mark Parrott, 85 th District Court Case No. 18-0849-SD.

Based on respondent’s conviction, admissions and the parties’ stipulation, the panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct when he engaged in conduct that was in violation of a criminal law of a state or of the United States, an ordinance, or tribal law pursuant to MCR 2.615, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, the panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded. Total costs were assessed in the amount of $792.57.

1 The Grievance Administrator filed a motion to dismiss the formal complaint (22-66-GA) portion of the combined Notice of Filing of Judgment of Conviction and Formal Complaint filed on August 26, 2022. The motion was granted by the panel in an order entered on November 11, 2022.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.