Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD CHAIRPERSON ALAN GERSHEL VICE-CHAIRPERSON REV. DR. LOUIS J. PRUES SECRETARY PETER A. SMIT LINDA M. ORLANS

JASON M. TURKISH ANDREAS SIDIROPOULOS, MD KATIE STANLEY TISH VINCENT

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

333 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1700 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3147 PHONE: 313-963-5553

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL SHERRY MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST/SECRETARY

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND (By Consent)

Case No. 23-11-JC Notice Issued: April 19, 2023 Heather M. Gosnick, P 75344, Chelsea, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Washtenaw County Hearing Panel #4

Reprimand, effective April 14, 2023 Respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Reprimand, pursuant to MCR 9.115(F)(5), that was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admission that she was convicted by guilty pleas on March 2, 2018, and April 19, 2022, respectively, of Driving While License Suspended/Revoked/Denied, a misdemeanor, in violation of MCL/PACC Code 257.9041B, in People v Heather Marie Gosnick, 14A3 District Court, Case No. 173-0527-SD; and Allowing Intoxicated Person to Operate a Motor Vehicle, a misdemeanor, in violation of MCL/PACC Code 257.6252-A, in People v Heather Marie Gosnick, 14A3 District Court, Case No. 183-0190-SD.

Based on respondent's conviction, admission and the parties' stipulation, the panel found that respondent engaged in conduct that violated a criminal law of a state or of the United States, an ordinance, or tribal law pursuant to MCR 2.615, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded. Costs were assessed in the amount of $759.82.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.