Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DER WIELE CHAIRPERSON REV. MICHAEL MURRAY

VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK. JR. LINDA S. HOTCHKISS. MD

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET. SUITE 1410

DETROIT. MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963ยท5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONISTISECRETARY

www.adbmlch.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND WITH CONDITIONS (By Consent)

Case No. 17-33-JC Notice Issued: January 19, 2018 Eugene H. Boyle, Jr., P 42023. Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #8.

Reprimand, Effective January 19, 2018 The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Reprimand. in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admission that he was convicted in a matter titled in People of the State of Michigan v Eugene Henry Boyle, 32nd District Court Case No. 2016-709723-SM, of domestic violence, a misdemeanor, in violation of MCl 750.812. Based on respondent's conviction and his admission in the stipulation, it was established that respondent engaged in conduct that violated a criminal law of a state or of the United States, an ordinance, or tribal law pursuant to MCR 2.615, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded. Additionally, the panel ordered that respondent be subject to conditions relevant to the established miscond ct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $769.92.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.