Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS REV. MICHAEL MURRAY CHAIRPERSON JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR.

LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD ANNA FRUSHOUR

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313·963·5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTlONlSTISECRETARY

ww.w adbmich.org

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION WITH CONDITIONS (By Consent)

Case Nos. 17-153-AI; 18-104-JC

Notice Issued: December 3,2018

Derrick N. Okonmah, P 68221, Clarkston, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri­ County Hearing Panel #1.

Suspension - 18 Months, Effective December 19,2017.

The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5),w hich was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admission that he was convicted in a matter titled People of the State of Michigan v Derrick Nnabuife Okonmah, Oakland County Circuit Court, Case No. 17 -265385-FH, of Operating While Impaired per se,3 rd Offense,a felony, in violation of MCl 257.625(1) and (9)(c),a nd Driving While License Suspended,2 nd Offense or Subsequent Offense, a misdemeanor, in violation of MCR 257.9 04(3)(a) and (b). Based on respondent's conviction and the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct by engaging in conduct that violated a criminal law of the State of Michigan, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 18 months and that he be subject to conditions relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $783.96.

{(tu . . arkA Armitage Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.