Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DERWIELE CHAIRPERSON REV. MICHAEL MURRAY VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR. LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTION/STISECRHARY

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION (Pending Appeal)

Case No. 15-151-GA Notice Issued: November 3,2017 Mark A. Chaban, P 57799, Plymouth, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Tri-County Hearing Panel #21.

Suspension - One Year, Effective October 31,2017 As alleged in the formal complaint, and established by the evidence and testimony submitted, the hearing panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct while representing the client-tenant in a landlord-tenant matter.

The hearing panel found that respondent brought or defended a proceeding, or asserted or controverted an issue therein, without a basis for doing so that was not frivolous, in violation of MRPC 3.1; failed to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client, in violation of MRPC 3.2; made knowingly false statements of material fact to a tribunal, in violation of MRPC 3.3(a); and knowingly made a false statement of material fact or law to a third person, in violation of MRPC 4.1. Respondent was also found to have violated MCR 9.104(1 )-(3) and MRPC 8.4(b) and (c).

The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for one year. Respondent filed a timely petition for review and this matter has been scheduled for hearing before the Attorney Discipline Board. Respondent also filed a request for a stay of discipline ich is pendin bef e the Board.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.