Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DER WIELE CHAIRPERSON REV. MICHAEL MURRAY

VICE· CHAIRPERSON DULCE M. FULLER SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN w. INHULSEN

JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR.

STATE OF MICIDGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226·3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRA TOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTION/STISECRETARY

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF DISBARMENT (Pending Review)

Case No. 14-36-GA Notice Issued: September 21,2017 Michael E. Tindall, P 29090, Falls Church, Virginia, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri­ County Hearing Panel #104.

Disbarred, Effective September 20, 2017 Based on the evidence presented by the parties at the hearings held in this matter, the hearing panel found that respondent committed the professional misconduct alleged in the formal complaint by bringing frivolous proceedings and asserting frivolous issues, in violation of MRPC 3.1. The panel also found that respondent engaged in conduct that involved dishonesty, fraud or misrepresentation, where such conduct reflected adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of MRPC 8.4(b); engaged in conduct that was in violation of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct, in violation of MRPC 8.4(a) and MCR 9.104(4); engaged in conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of MRPC 8.4(c) and MCR 9.104(1); engaged in conduct that exposed the legal profession or the courts to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach, in violation of MCR 9.104(2); and engaged in conduct that was contrary to justice, in violation of MCR 9.104(3).

The panel ordered that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law. Respondent filed a timely petition for review and this matter has been scheduled for hearing before the Attorney Discipline Board. Respondent also filed a request for a stay of discipline which was denied by the Board on September 21, 2017. ~a~ Mark A. Armitage Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.