Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DERWIELE CHAIRPERSON REV. MICHAEL MURRAY VICE-CHAIRPERSON DULCE M. FULLER SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR.

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMIN/STRA TOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTION/STISECRETARY

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND Case No. 15-87-GA

Notice Issued: June 15, 2017 Carl L. Collins, III, P 55982, Southfield, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board TriĀ­ County Hearing Panel #81.

Reprimand, Effective June 15, 2017. After proceedings in accordance with MCR 9.115, the hearing panel found that respondent neglected a legal matter entrusted to him, in violation of MRPC 1.1 (c); failed to seek the lawful objectives of a client through reasonably available means permitted by law, in violation of MRPC 1.2(a); failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, in violation of MRPC 1.3; failed to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that all lawyers in the firm conform to the Rules of Professional Conduct, in violation of MRPC 5.1 (a); as a lawyer having direct supervisor authority over other lawyers in his law firm, failed to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the other lawyers conformed to the Rules of Professional Conduct, in violation of MRPC 5.1 (b); maintained funds other than client or third person funds in an IOLT A, in violation of MRPC 1.15(a)(3); and deposited his own funds in a client trust account more than in an amount reasonably necessary to pay financial institution service charges, in violation of MRPC 1.15(f).

The hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded. Total costs were assessed in the amount of $4,926.89.

~a~ Mark A. Armitage Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.