Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR. CHAIRPERSON LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD VICE-CHAIRPERSON REV. DR. LOUIS J. PRUES SECRETARY KAREN D. O’DONOGHUE MICHAEL S. HOHAUSER

PETER A. SMIT ALAN GERSHEL LINDA M. ORLANS JASON M. TURKISH

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

333 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1700

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL SHERRY MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST/SECRETARY

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3147

PHONE: 313-963-5553

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF DISBARMENT (By Consent)

Case Nos. 21-83-AI; 22-50-JC Notice Issued: September 30, 2022 Jay A. Schwartz, P 45268, Northville, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #21.

Disbarment, Effective November 17, 2021 Respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Disbarment which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent’s admission that he was convicted of by jury verdict of one count of bribery conspiracy concerning programs receiving federal funds, a felony, in violation of 18 § USC 666(a)(2) and 18 § USC 371; and two counts of bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds, felonies, in violation of 18 § USC 666(a)(2), in United States of America v Jay A. Schwartz, United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan Case No. 3:19-cr-20451-RHC. In accordance with MCR 9.120(B)(1), respondent’s license to practice law in Michigan was automatically suspended, effective November 17, 2021, the date of his felony conviction.

Based on respondent’s convictions, admissions and the parties' stipulation, the panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct when he engaged in conduct that violated a criminal law of a state or of the United States, an ordinance, or tribal law pursuant to MCR 2.615, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law in Michigan. Total costs were assessed in the amount of $1,252.84.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.