Opinions and Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

STATE OF MICHIGAN Attorney Discipline Board

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Attorney Grievance Commission,

v

Petitioner/Appellant,

Case No. 12-17-GA

FlLEn A1 roRNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD 13 HAY -I PH 3: 06

MARK J. TYSLENKO, P 62987, Respondent/Appellee ______________________~ I

ORDER INCREASING DISCIPLINE FROM A SUSPENSION OF 45 DAYS WITH CONDITIONS TO DISBARMENT

Issued by the Attorney Discipline Board 211 W. Fort St., Ste. 1410, Detroit, MI

The Grievance Administrator has petitioned the Attorney Discipline Board for review of the order of suspension entered in this matter by Tri-Valley Hearing Panel #1 on November 27, 2012. The Board has conducted review proceedings in accordance with MCR 9.118, which included a review of the record before the hearing panel and consideration of the briefs and arguments submitted by the parties, and the Board is otherwise fully advised;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the attached opinion, discipline in this case is increased from a suspension of 45 days with conditions to DISBARMENT OF RESPONDENT'S LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW IN MICHIGAN EFFECTIVE MAY 30. 2013, and until further order of the Supreme Court, the Attorney Discipline Board or a hearing panel, and until respondent complies with the requirements of MCR 9.123(B) and (C) and MCR 9.124. In determining the five year period of ineligibility to petition for reinstatement under MCR 9.124(0)(2), respondent shall be given credit for the 45 day period of suspension served between December 18, 2012, and February 4, 2013.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall pay court reporting costs incurred by the Board for the review hearing conducted on March 27, 2013 in the amount of $108.50. This cost shall be added to the payment plan currently in effect. Respondent's final payment shall now be due on or before January 20, 2014, in the amount of $1 08.50. Costs may be paid by check or money order made payable to the State Bar of Michigan but submitted to the Attorney Discipline Board, 211 West Fort St., Ste. 1410, DetrOit, M148226, for proper crediting.

DATED: May 1, ยท2013

By:

Board members Thomas G. Kienbaum, Carl E. Ver Beek, Sylvia P. Whitmer, Ph.D., Lawrence G. Campbell, Dulce M. Fuller, and Louann Van Der Wiele concur in this decision.

Board members James M. Cameron, Jr., Rosalind E. Griffin, M.D., and Craig H. Lubben, did not participate.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.