Opinions and Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

STATE OF MICHIGAN Al runNE' . . . dO MAR 25 PH 3: 07 Attorney Dll§cllphne Boar

In the Matter of the Reinstatement Petition of DAVID S. FEINBERG, P 42854,

Petitioner/Appellant, ----------------------------./

Case No. 08-70-RP

ORDER AFFIRMING HEARING PANEL ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

Issued by the Attorney Discipline Board 211 W. Fort St., Ste. 1410, Detroit, MI

Livingston County Hearing Panel #1 of the Attorney Discipline Board entered an order in this matter on April 2, 2009 denying the petition for reinstatement filed by petitioner David S. Feinberg. Petitioner sought review of that decision by the Attorney Discipline Board in accordance with MCR 9.118. The Board has conducted review proceedings, including review of the record before the panel and consideration of the briefs and arguments presented by the parties and the Board is otherwise fully advised,

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the order denying petition for reinstatement filed in this matter on April 2, 2009 is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in the opinion issued this date.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall, on or before April 23, 2010, pay costs in the amount of $1,195.49, which total represents $1,098.49 in costs previously assessed in the hearing panel order of April 2, 2009, and $97.00 for transcript fees incurred at the review hearing conducted September 9, 2009. Check or money order shall be made payable to the State Bar of Michigan, but submitted to the Attorney Discipline Board [211 West Fort St., Ste. 1410, Detroit, MI 48226] for proper crediting. (See attached instruction sheet).

BOARD

DATED: March 25, 2010

By:

Board members William J. Danhof, Thomas G. Kienbaum, William L. Matthews, C.P.A., Rosalind E. Griffin, M.D., Carl E. Ver Beek, Craig H. Lubben and James M. Cameron, Jr., concur in this decision.

Board members Billy Ben Baumann, MD., and Andrea L. Solak did not participate.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.