STATE OF MICHIGAN
Attorney Discipline Board
GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR,
Attorney Grievance Commission,
Petitioner/Appellee,
v
Case No. 22-77-GA
BRIAN T. DAILEY, P 39945,
Respondent/Appellant.
/
ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Issued by the Attorney Discipline Board
333 W. Fort St., Ste. 1700, Detroit, MI
Respondent filed a motion seeking reconsideration of the Attorney Discipline Board’s March 24, 2025 order affirming in part and vacating in part findings of misconduct, increasing discipline from a five-year suspension to disbarment, and affirming restitution. The Grievance Administrator filed a response requesting that respondent’s motion be denied.
The Board has considered respondent’s motion together with the response filed by the Grievance Administrator, and is otherwise fully advised;
NOW THEREFORE,
IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Respondent’s motion merely presents the same issues already ruled on by the Board. Respondent has failed to demonstrate a palpable error by which the Board has been misled, or to otherwise demonstrate that the March 24, 2025 decision of the Board was entered erroneously, such that correction of the alleged errors would result in a different disposition.
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD
By: /s/ Peter A. Smit, Vice-Chairperson
Dated: June 11, 2025
Board Members Peter A. Smit, Rev. Dr. Louis J. Prues, Linda M. Orlans, Jason M. Turkish, Katie M. Stanley, Tish Vincent, and Kamilia Landrum concur in this decision.
Board Member Andreas Sidiropoulos, MD was absent and did not participate in this decision.
Board Member Alan Gershel is recused from this matter and did not participate in this decision.