Opinions and Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

Attorney Discipline Board

 

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR,

Attorney Grievance Commission,

 

Petitioner/Appellee,

v                                                                                                         

Case No.  22-91-GA

CRAIG A. TANK, P 58360,

 

Respondent/Appellant.

                                                        /

 

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

Issued by the Attorney Discipline Board

333 W. Fort St., Ste. 1700, Detroit, MI

 

Respondent filed a motion seeking reconsideration of the Attorney Discipline Boards July 16, 2025 order decreasing discipline from disbarment to a four‑year suspension, affirming restitution, and modifying the order of discipline to add conditions.  The Grievance Administrator filed a response requesting that respondents motion be denied. 

 

The Board has considered respondents motion together with the response filed by the Grievance Administrator, and is otherwise fully advised;

 

NOW THEREFORE,

 

IT IS ORDERED that respondents motion for reconsideration is DENIED.  Respondents motion merely presents the same issues already ruled on by the Board.  Respondent has failed to demonstrate a palpable error by which the Board has been misled, or to otherwise demonstrate that the July 16, 2025 decision of the Board was entered erroneously, such that correction of the alleged errors would result in a different disposition.  We feel compelled to note that by reading respondent's request for relief and doing the simple math, together with the fact that the checks respondent attached to his motion were neither offered nor accepted into evidence during the hearings, clearly shows that there was never any merit to respondent's motion, and it should have been clear to respondents counsel that was the case.  As such, the Board would be within it's right to impose sanctions pursuant to MCR 1.109(E)(6).  Although it is a close call, we decline to do so here.

 

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD 

 

 

By:  /s/ Peter A. Smit, Vice-Chairperson

 

Dated:  October 14, 2025

 

Board Members Peter A. Smit, Rev. Dr. Louis J. Prues, Linda M. Orlans, Jason M. Turkish, Andreas Sidiropoulos, MD, Katie M. Stanley, and Tish Vincent concur in this decision.

 

Board Member Kamilia Landrum was absent and did not participate in this decision.

 

Board Member Alan Gershel is recused from this matter and did not participate in this decision.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.