Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS STATE OF MICHIGAN REV. MICHAEL MURRAY CHAIRPERSON JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR.

LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD ANNA FRUSHOUR

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313·963·5553 I FAX: 313·963·5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRA TOR

ALLY SON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTlONISTISECRETARY

ww.w adbmich.org

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION WITH CONDITIONS (By Consent)

Case No. 18-129-JC

Notice Issued: January 4, 2019

Donald J. Neville, P 60213, Howell,M County Hearing Panel #1.

ichigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Livingston

Suspension - 30 Days, Effective January 30,2019

The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Suspension with Conditions and Stipulation to Amend Stipulation for Consent Discipline to Change the Effective Date of the Order of Discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admission that he was convicted of domestic violence, 2nd offense,i n violation of MCl 750.813,a misdemeanor, in People of the State of Michigan v Donald Joseph Nevilel , 53rd District Court Case No. 17- 3879-SM.

Based on respondent's conviction, admissions and the stipulation of the parties,i t has been established that respondent engaged in conduct that violated a criminal law of a state or of the United States, an ordinance, or tribal law pursuant to MCR 2.615, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 30 days. Additionally,t he panel ordered that respondent be subject to conditions relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $763.92.

Mark A. Armitage Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.